“A security review process that is bypassed is worse than no review process at all. Risk-proportionate review is what makes the process respected rather than routed around.”
The most common governance complaint from delivery teams: the solution was built in two days and the review has taken six weeks. Every solution — regardless of risk — entered the same queue. The answer is not less governance. It is the right level of governance for each solution’s actual risk profile.
The Risk-Based Model
Solutions within the pre-approved envelope — standard connector set, Public or Internal data only, no custom code, Managed Environment deployment — clear governance automatically through Solution Checker enforcement. No manual review required.
Solutions outside the envelope — Confidential data, custom connectors, external-facing capability, or integrations with enterprise systems — enter a defined review process proportionate to the risk they carry.
What Power Platform Provides
Solution Checker automated quality enforcement before every pipeline promotion. The BOLT pre-approval envelope defines the boundary between automatic clearance and manual review. Power Platform Admin Center audit logs provide the compliance evidence trail for every deployment regardless of path taken.
The Enterprise Gap
Most organisations define the review process but not the pre-approval envelope. Everything enters the queue. The queue gets longer. Makers find ways around it. Defining the envelope — and making it visible to makers — is what makes the review process respected.
One Action
Publish the pre-approval envelope to the maker community. Define clearly what can proceed without manual review and what enters the review queue. Measure the proportion of solutions clearing automatically each month. A rising proportion means governance is enabling delivery.
Part 29 of 36 | #PowerPlatformAtScale
The full Inspect model, including the risk-based review framework and pre-approval envelope design, are in the book.